<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: gospel of Judas</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.dksez.com/?feed=rss2&#038;p=121" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.dksez.com/?p=121</link>
	<description>Quips, queries, and querulous quibbles from the quirky mind of Don Kahle</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2010 17:30:03 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: BillThePoet</title>
		<link>http://www.dksez.com/?p=121&#038;cpage=1#comment-52</link>
		<dc:creator>BillThePoet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Apr 2006 01:40:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dksez.com/?p=121#comment-52</guid>
		<description>My sense is that I&#039;m still a half a dozen re-readings away from getting it, but this feels like an important piece.  

[How can you make BillThePoet yell Aha! during Easter service?  Give him dk&#039;s Judas column on Palm Sunday.]

I have only a Philosophy 101 Student Union all-nighter understanding of gnostic thinking, so I was sort of uncomfortable with this &quot;discovery.&quot;  Why wouldn&#039;t contemporaneous witness testimony be more valid than the various modern and too-institutional franchise versions of the Good News?  And if I were He, wouldn&#039;t it be irresistable to let Judas in on the secret?  Whisper he was completing the prophesy?  Like the old golf joke about God giving the preacher a hole in one when he was playing hookey on Easter Sunday -- who&#039;s he gonna tell?

But as dk observes, it was dismissed _at the time_ as heretical.  And if I&#039;m going to assign contemporaneous validity to the Gospel of Judas, I guess I have to extend the same courtesy to the group that contemporaneously condemned it as a privately motivated distortion.

Hey, dk, how about a column on short walk-don&#039;t walk cycles on Eugene traffic lights?  My brain hurts.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My sense is that I&#8217;m still a half a dozen re-readings away from getting it, but this feels like an important piece.  </p>
<p>[How can you make BillThePoet yell Aha! during Easter service?  Give him dk's Judas column on Palm Sunday.]</p>
<p>I have only a Philosophy 101 Student Union all-nighter understanding of gnostic thinking, so I was sort of uncomfortable with this &#8220;discovery.&#8221;  Why wouldn&#8217;t contemporaneous witness testimony be more valid than the various modern and too-institutional franchise versions of the Good News?  And if I were He, wouldn&#8217;t it be irresistable to let Judas in on the secret?  Whisper he was completing the prophesy?  Like the old golf joke about God giving the preacher a hole in one when he was playing hookey on Easter Sunday &#8212; who&#8217;s he gonna tell?</p>
<p>But as dk observes, it was dismissed _at the time_ as heretical.  And if I&#8217;m going to assign contemporaneous validity to the Gospel of Judas, I guess I have to extend the same courtesy to the group that contemporaneously condemned it as a privately motivated distortion.</p>
<p>Hey, dk, how about a column on short walk-don&#8217;t walk cycles on Eugene traffic lights?  My brain hurts.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
